What we do

Production and research define our approach to open-source architecture and urbanism.

These core focus areas encompass housing, public space, tactical urbanism, and citizen participation, alongside the development of digital, manual, pedagogical, and collaborative tools.

Categorized into three formats—R&D Resources, Connections, and Processes/Projects—here is an overview of how we operate:

We partner with those who seek to intervene in their own living spaces. Our practice is truly intergenerational; we engage with everyone from the very young to senior citizens. Deeply committed to gender equity, we ensure every voice is heard, recognizing that our spaces must be feminized and diversified to foster genuine inclusivity and excellence.

We are deeply invested in the construction phase of our projects. Furthermore, we advocate for active participation throughout every stage of the process, from initial conception to physical execution. Spaces that are collectively envisioned from the outset and built through collaboration possess a distinct quality; they are inhabited and nurtured in a profoundly different way. In our view, this empowerment is a cornerstone of what we define as The Right to the City.

For years, we have been active participants in the evolution of open-source architecture. From the outset, we recognized the need for new instruments to challenge the traditional foundations of urban production. We understood early on that we were not alone in this endeavor; we have been fortunate to find exceptional collaborators with whom to develop tools for both practice and knowledge-sharing. These outputs take many forms—web platforms, guides, assembly manuals, games, and beyond. Every resource we develop is released under open licenses, ensuring they remain available for public use.

We strive to design and build according to sustainability criteria. By this, we mean making the most of and reusing materials and resources in general, resulting in processes that are more ecological but also more economical. These two things usually go hand in hand. Furthermore, the former is good for the planet and the latter is good for social inclusion, especially when we think of groups with fewer means. Resources come and go—people provide them or request them—and the network helps to distribute them in the best possible way.