Three Florida teenagers recently pleaded not guilty to the brutal beatings and in one case, death, of homeless men. One of the beatings was caught on surveillance video and in a most chilling way illustrates how people can degrade socially outcast individuals, enough to engage in mockery, physical abuse, and even murder. According to new research, the brain processes social outsiders as less than human; brain imaging provides accurate depictions of this prejudice at an unconscious level.

A new study by Princeton University psychology researchers Lasana Harris and Susan Fiske shows that when viewing photographs of social out-groups, people respond to them with disgust, not a feeling of fellow humanity. The findings are reported in the article "Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low: Neuro-imaging responses to Extreme Outgroups" in a forthcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society).

Twenty four Princeton University undergraduates viewed a large number of color photographs of different social groups (including Olympic athletes, business professionals, elderly people, and drug addicts), and images of objects (including the Space Shuttle, a sports car, a cemetery, and an overflowing toilet) that elicited the emotions of pride, envy, pity, or disgust. The four emotions were derived from the Stereotype Content Model (SCM), which predicts differentiated prejudices based on warmth and competence. Warmth was determined by friendliness, competence by capability. The two emotional extremes were pride and disgust; pride elicited high warmth and high perception of competence, and disgust elicited low warmth and low perception of competence. Envy and pity were considered moderate prejudices; envy elicited low warmth and high perception of competence, and pity elicited high warmth and low perception of competence.

Medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) brain imaging determined if the students accurately chose the correct emotion illustrated by the picture (according to pretest results in which a different group of students determined the emotion that best fit each photograph). The MPFC is only activated when a person thinks about him- or her-self or another human. When viewing a picture representing disgust, however, no significant MPFC brain activity was recorded, showing that students did not perceive members of social out-groups as human. The area was only activated when viewing photographs that elicited pride, envy, and pity. (However, other brain regions -- the amygdala and insula -- were activated when viewing photographs of "disgusting" people and nonhuman objects.)

Emotions themselves were not responsible for generating this brain activity. Rather, it was the actual image viewed that produced a response. The MPFC only showed significant activity when a person saw or thought about a human being. The authors conclude that this lack of MPFC brain activity while viewing photographs of people proves that "members of some social groups seem to be dehumanized."

Social out-groups are perceived as unable to experience complex human emotions, share in-group beliefs, or act according to societal norms, moral rules, and values. The authors describe this as "extreme discrimination revealing the worst kind of prejudice: excluding out-groups from full humanity." Their study provides evidence that while individuals may consciously see members of social out-groups as people, the brain processes social out-groups as something less than human, whether we are aware of it or not. According to the authors, brain imaging provides a more accurate depiction of this prejudice than the verbal reporting usually used in research studies. >from *Detecting prejudice in the brain*. June 29, 2006.

related context
> people more likely to help others they think are 'like them'. 'while all the people felt empathy for someone in distress, they only tended to assist if the needy person was viewed as a member of their own 'in-group.' july 7, 2006
> brain study yields insight into machinery of prejudice. 'prejudice may arise in part because perceivers assume that outgroup members' mental states do not correspond to their own and, accordingly, mentalize in a non-self-referential way about the minds of people from different groups. without a self-referential basis for mentalizing about outgroup members, perceivers may rely heavily on precomputed judgments--such as stereotypes--to make mental state inferences about very dissimilar others. this view suggests that a critical strategy for reducing prejudice may be to breach the arbitrary boundaries based on social group membership by focusing instead on the shared similarity between oneself and outgroup members.' may 17, 2006
>mirror neurons. 'are activated not only when performing an action oneself, but also while observing someone else perform that action. it is believed mirror neurons increase an individual's ability to understand the behaviors of others.' march 11, 2005
>others' intentions. march 5, 2004
>interracial interactions are cognitively demanding. 'harboring racial bias in an increasingly diverse society may be bad for one's cognitive performance.' december 1, 2003
>rejection affects human brain in same way as physical pain. 'physical and social pain may be more similar than we realized. the pain of being rejected may have evolved because of the importance of social bonds for the survival.' november 10, 2003
>inverse amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex responses to surprised faces. september 2, 2003
>brain shows unconscious prejudices. 'to the extent that we can influence what we learn and believe, we can influence less conscious states of mind, we can determine who we are and who we wish to be.' july 17, 2003
>eye gaze direction: how the brain perceives emotion. 'the direction of another's gaze influences how your brain responds to fear and anger expressed by that person, specifically in your amygdala.' june 13, 2003

imago
> erase stereotypes and prejudices

sonic flow
> brainjudice [stream]
brainjudice [download]