icann is at a crossroads
::
new roadmap proposal
At the ICANN Board of Directors, President Stuart Lynn proposed
a sweeping series of structural reforms for ICANN. The process of
relocating functions from the US Government to ICANN is stalled.
"The current structure of ICANN was widely recognized as an experiment
when created three years ago," noted Board Chairman Vint Cerf. "The
rapid expansion of and increasing global dependence on the Internet
have made it clear that a new structure is essential if ICANN is
to fulfill its mission."
ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) was
formed three years ago as an entirely private global organization
designed to assume responsibility for the DNS root from the United
States government and to coordinate technical policy for the Internet's
naming and address allocation systems. Nothing like this had ever
been done before. ICANN is a bold experiment in the management of
a unique global resource. ICANN was to serve as an alternative to
the traditional, pre-Internet model of a multinational governmental
treaty organization. ICANN have some real accomplishments: the introduction
of a competitive registrar market, the Uniform Dispute Resolution
Policy, the creation of seven new global Top Level Domains. But
ICANN is still not fully organized, and it is certainly not yet
capable of shouldering the entire responsibility of global DNS management
and coordination.
It is essential to state unambiguously what falls outside of ICANN's
scope. The core ICANN mission includes no mandate to innovate new
institutions of global democracy, nor to achieve mathematically
equal representation of all affected individuals and organizations,
nor to regulated content, nor to solve the problems of the digital
divide, nor to embody some idealized (and never-before-realized)
model of process or procedure. However important those ideals may
be, they are for other, better-suited organizations to address.
Unfortunately, we have allowed the advocates for these and other
non-core objectives to divert ICANN from what must be its tight
focus on its core mission. These diversions have been and will continue
to be a significant impediment to accomplishing ICANN's core mission,
unless we undertake a powerful reform of ICANN's structure and operations,
and a committed refocus on its limited but important mission.
In the new proposals, the basic mission remains intact. What changes
is the means of achieving that mission. Reform must replace ICANN's
unstable institutional foundations with an effective public-private
partnership, rooted in the private sector but with the active backing
and participation of national governments. "What has become clear
to me and others is that a purely private organization will not
work," said Lynn. "The Internet has become too important to national
economic and social progress. Governments, as the representatives
of their populations, must participate more directly in ICANN's
debates and policymaking functions. We must find the right form
of global public-private partnership - one that combines the agility
and strength of a private organization with the authority of governments
to represent the public interest."
"It is simply unrealistic to expect ICANN thinly-staffed, underfunded,
technically-oriented ICANN to be able to achieve what no other
global institution has: a global electorate expressing its will
through stable representative institutions... Although governments
vary around the world, for better or worse they are the most evolved
and best legitimated representatives of their populations that
is, of the public interest... the concept of At Large membership
elections from a self-selected pool of unknown voters is not just
flawed, but fatally flawed." Currently, five of the 19 board members
are elected by the general Internet community. Under the new plan,
the board would consist of 15 members: one third nominated by governments,
one-third through a committee process and the rest consisting of
ICANN's president and appointments by four policy and technical
groups.
An ineffective ICANN virtually invites the fragmentation of the
Internet by those with parochial commercial, cultural, or political
interests into zones that cannot reliably communicate with each
other an outcome that would be profoundly negative for the Internet
and would seriously retard its continued growth as a global medium
to support critical commercial and social goals, and a medium for
communication and expression. >from *ICANN
President Recommends a Roadmap for Reform*, and *related
paper written by Stuart Lynn*, february 24, 2002
related context
> tilting
at icann. march 19,2002
> should
geeks, or governments, run the net? march 14, 2002
> preliminary
report icann meeting in accra. march 14, 2002
> new
top level domains. november 16, 2000
|