>>> context weblog
sampling new cultural context
| home | site map | about context | donate | lang >>> español - català |
wednesday :: april 9, 2003
   
 
synchrony: order is inevitable

Science, which has long considered order and synchrony the exception rather than the rule in a chaotic universe, is beginning to come around. In his new book, Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order, Steven Strogatz, who is professor of applied mathematics at Cornell, describes the new science.

Synchrony, says Strogatz, shows up in the most unlikely of places: from satellite orbits to whizzing electrons, from the chirping of crickets to the tendency of women who live in close quarters or who spend a lot of time together to menstruate around the same time of the month.

Order is all around us, and scientists in diverse disciplines are constantly uncovering new examples of it. But Strogatz and his colleagues make a far more extraordinary claim: Order is not just possible, it is inevitable. In 1989 Strogatz, along with Boston College mathematician Rennie Mirollo, proved mathematically that any system of 'coupled oscillators' -- that is, entities capable of responding to each other's signals, be they crickets, electrons or celestial bodies -- will spontaneously self-organize. >from *In his book Sync, Cornell's Steven Strogatz writes compelling history of a scientific revolution long in the making*. Cornell news release, march 7, 2003

related context
>
another world is happening: network-based movements. march 3, 2003
> >synchronization of pulse-coupled biological oscillators. Mirollo, R.E., and Strogatz, S.H. 1990.

imago
>
crickets developing order to spontaneously self-organize

| permaLink

 
 
comments

There is even order in the periodic table, charting all the elements that the planet, and therefore life, is made from.

You may find this article interesting too: http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/O/origins/media/docs/originsEarth.doc 'Cave Clues to Early Life'

posted by dreamer at April 9, 2003 08:39 AM.

---

Hi, I loved the text, and I would like to add some comments to synchronic interactions...

First, I was thinking: Not only all the matter in the planet, but in the universe, seems made up just from a few more than hundred elements.

The ordering in the periodic table reflects the fact that there are no half atoms, nor half protons (or half neutrons or half electrons)*, so Hydrogen, the first atom has one proton, Helium, the second, has two protons, and it adds up to the heaviest elements (Lawrencium has 107 protons).** This fascinating "order" belongs to the fascinating realm of quantum mechanics.

In addition, to me, there are other kinds of order:

I like to think that: in fact, energy interacts with mater, mater interacts with energy, energy interacts with energy and mater interacts with mater. The interaction is often noisy and attenuating (through dissipation). When the number of energy and matter units interacting is large, we are not able to predict or describe the system with conventional equations, and we have plenty of complex systems at view: polymers, ceramics, glasses, magnetism, biology, cosmology, sociology, statistics, market theory...

Systems where the behavior is the result of the dynamic balance of different forces and different units... It may be like the sea, describing a wave, perfectly, it is not sufficient to understand the movement of the ensemble. And as with the waves, the 'usually' expected behavior is a disordered one, as the sea (can you imagine the sea with all the waves synchronized, it would be scaring!! :-) ).


However, sometimes the interaction is constructive. And the effect cooperative, then something amazing comes out: the crystal, the ferromagnetism, the superconductivity... We could talk about synchrony as a mathematical model: as a particular solution to an ensemble of equations, but I do not know much about that.

On the other side, there are other examples of interest about collective behavior, for example: the laser.

In a simplistic way, when the matter (of a filament) is excited, electrons jump to excited states (could be pictured as: they go further from the core) and rapidly they go back to their ground state (they come back to the place they spontaneously belong). The energy that they took to go up, they release it to get in. Emitting thus a photon.
When a bunch of atoms with a bunch of electrons jumping up and down are emitting photons, they interact between them, collide and lose energy, and get dark. However, if all the electrons could be excited and de-excited at the same time, they will all send just a wave of photons all of them together. And you apply more power and you get another wave, and another wave, and another wave... of coherent light, orders and orders of magnitude more powerful and focused than conventional light.


*you may break the proton into smaller particles, but none of them is a proton -nothing similar- anymore.
** Curiously enough, the number of protons determine the properties and the identity of the element, since species are neutral, thus there is always the same number of electrons (i.e., the number of electrons is determined by the number of protons), and a random number of neutrons, close to the number of protons, sometimes the same, sometimes not. The ratio between protons and neutrons in the core of the atom is related to the radioactivity of certain elements, but this is another story.

posted by victor f puntes at April 11, 2003 05:31 PM.

---


post a comment !

name:

email address:

url:

comments:



[reload page to see your comment]
 

write your mail and will send you the updates





recommend to a friend

email this blog to:

your email address:

message (optional):

> context weblog archive
september 2006
august 2006
july 2006
june 2006
may 2006
april 2006
march 2006
february 2006
january 2006
december 2005
november 2005
october 2005
september 2005
august 2005
july 2005
june 2005
may 2005
april 2005
march 2005
february 2005
january 2005
december 2004
november 2004
october 2004
september 2004
august 2004
july 2004
june 2004
may 2004
april 2004
march 2004
february 2004
january 2004
december 2003
november 2003
october 2003
june 2003
may 2003
april 2003
march 2003
february 2003
january 2003
december 2002
november 2002
october 2002
july 2002
june 2002
may 2002
april 2002
march 2002
february 2002
january 2002
countdown 2002
december 2001
november 2001
october 2001
september 2001
august 2001

more news in
> sitemap

send your comments to
> context(at)straddle3.net

Google


context archives all www
   "active, informed citizen participation is the key to shaping the network society. a new 'public sphere' is required." seattle statement
| home | site map | about context | donate | lang >>> español - català |
03 http://straddle3.net/context/03/en/2003_04_09.html