The smell of an odor is not merely a result of chemical detection but is also influenced by what the smeller learns about the odor. Now, researchers have discovered how such "perceptual learning" about an odor influences processing of information from the purely olfactory chemical detection system. Wen Li, Jay Gottfried, and colleagues at Northwestern University reported their findings with human subjects.
"Verbal context strongly influences the perception of odor quality—a rose by any other name would not smell as sweet," explained the researchers. "For example, the same odorant smells entirely different depending on whether it is labeled as fresh cucumber or mildew."
"Learning also changes odor quality. A cherry odor becomes smokier in quality after being experienced together with a smoky odor. Thus, a given set of olfactory receptors activated by an odorant may not map directly onto a given odor percept. Rather, odor perception may rely on more synthetic, or integrative, mechanisms subserved by higher-order brain regions," they wrote.
In a previous study, Gottfried and colleagues had identified regions of the cortex involved in "coding" odors. In the new study, they sought to explore whether perceptual learning about an odor lead to changes in subjects’ ability to differentiate the odors.
The researchers concluded that "prolonged exposure to one odorant resulted in improved differentiation among related odorants (and even among novel related odorants). Thus, with exposure to a floral-smelling alcohol (i.e., phenethyl alcohol), subjects effectively became floral ‘experts’ and simultaneously became experts for the underlying molecular group," they wrote. The subjects appeared to be "developing more refined, or differentiated, subcategories of these olfactory features," wrote the researchers.
"The current findings, along with recent data from our laboratory, provide further evidence that odor quality coding in olfactory cortex is not a straightforward outcome of odorant structure," they concluded. "In all likelihood, neural representations of odor quality are a dynamic product of lower-level coding from olfactory bulb and higher-level cortical inputs, under the regulation of learning and experience, attention, sensory context, and language.
"We speculate that the process of odor feature differentiation, via sensory exposure, may underlie much of the way that humans naturally learn to identify odors in the environment, with progressive and ever more refined differentiation, to the point where we are able to recognize thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of different smells," they wrote.
"This mechanism may underlie the acquisition of fine-grained percepts that distinguish, for example, the smell of Rosa damascena (Bulgarian Rose) from that of Rosa centifolia (Rose Maroc), to the point where we would be able to appreciate the immense richness of aromas in everyday life," they wrote.
Li et al.: "Learning to Smell the Roses: Experience-Dependent Neural Plasticity in Human Piriform and Orbitofrontal Cortices." Publishing in Neuron 52, 1097–1108, December 21, 2006 DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.026 www.neuron.org >from *How learning influences smell*. December 20, 2006
> a quoi ca sert l'amour by edith piaf and theo sarapo
> window into human behavior, brain disease. 'von economo neurons may play a role in what makes humans 'human' – self awareness, moral reasoning and empathy –.' december 22, 2006
> how we differentiate smells. 'the magnitude of brain activity in the orbitofrontal cortex predicted how much of an olfactory expert a person would become as a result of passive learning. information about an odor is not static or fixed within these cortical regions, but is highly malleable and can be rapidly updated by perceptual experience. this malleability of the brain is called neural plasticity.' december 21, 2006
> paying attention sets off symphony of cell synchronization. 'the mystery of how attention improves the perception of incoming sensory stimulation has been a long-time concern of scientists. how attention operates?' december 20, 2006
> watch and learn. 'watching with intent to repeat ignites key learning area of brain.' december 20, 2006
> mental link between actions and words. 'what is the difference in our minds between talk and action?.' september 18, 2006
> a rose tree may be a rose tree may be a rosy rose tree
... if watered
sonic flow| permalink
> ... [mp3]
... [other formats]